When many people think of archival records, they think of paper – paper in files and filing cabinets, files in boxes, loose pages in drawers, bound ledgers and registers, printed photographs. But many archivists think about records more broadly. For example, the New South Wales State Records Act 1998 defines a ‘record’ as: “any document or other source of information compiled, recorded or stored in written form or on film, or by electronic process, or in any other manner or by any other means”[1] [my italics].
I was reminded of this last month, as part of my role as Lead Archivist on the National Find & Connect web resource project. Since the Magill Training Centre (Adelaide) closed in 2012 South Australian historians Karen George and Gary George – both working on the Find & Connect web resource – had been asking for permission to photograph the interior. When the start date for demolition was publicly announced just before Christmas they asked again. Karen and Gary were specifically interested in a mural painted in the 1970s when the McNally Training Centre ran on the site. An artist had come in to the Centre and worked with the kids on a design. Some of the kids at the Centre were also involved in helping with the painting.
Permission to photograph the site and mural was refused, and in the first week of January 2014 demolition started. When chased up, demolition workers told Gary and Karen they had been specifically instructed not to allow people onto the site, and not to allow people (including demolition workers) to take any photographs. Before these decisions could be reversed (and apparently earlier than expected based on publicly accessible information) the mural was demolished.
The central importance of records to Forgotten Australians, Former Child Migrants and others who were in institutional ‘care’ is a concept constantly reinforced by the community, advocacy groups, sector workers, senate reports and more. There are some paper records related to McNally that survive, but we must be aware that – especially where records play such a vital role in identity formation and understanding the past – we have a collective responsibility to locate, preserve and provide access to more than just paper. Records can be any significant source of information, evidence or meaning, recorded in any manner, by any means, including hand-painted walls.
If the wall featured a mural by Keith Haring or Banksy the situation might be different. Haring’s mural on Johnston Street, Collingwood is rightly on the Victorian Heritage Register. But there are plenty of examples of important political graffiti and street art as social commentary, much of it by unknown hands, without the same prominence. If the mural is by a forgotten group of kids in the 1970s, for many its perceived importance drops even further.
Some organisations do recognise the significance of these ‘non-traditional’ records. For example, the New South Wales Benevolent Society recently agreed to sell the property containing Scarba House which will eventually result in the loss of public access to the building. Therefore, they are creating an online record of the house and grounds using photos and other materials – a ‘virtual tour’ – to digitally preserve Scarba House and its surrounds.
Where this isn’t happening, archivists, historians and others need to work with the community to keep raising awareness and advocating for change. Case files and admission registers are critical records for Forgotten Australians. But paintings, walls, buildings, gardens, objects, mementos and bric-a-brac can all be important records too and we must seek to preserve them, even if only digitally. Sometimes these ‘non-traditional’ records can contain more meaning and emotion than words on a page; and sometimes they are the only records left.
[1] State Records Act 1998, New South Wales Consolidated Acts, http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/sra1998156/s3.html
April 8, 2014 at 9:18 pm
An excellent piece, this one. Important. But – in case I want to use this case as an example in a lecture, or refer to it in a blog post – what was the Magill Training Centre?
April 8, 2014 at 9:39 pm
Many thanks Gudmund.
The Magill Training Centre is the contemporary name for what was (at the time the mural was painted) the McNally Training Centre: http://www.findandconnect.gov.au/ref/sa/biogs/SE00078b.htm – a secure care facility run by the government for boys aged 15 to 18.
The Centre’s predecessors go back to the 1860s. We have also documented some of the archival records associated with the institution as part of our Find & Connect web resource: http://www.findandconnect.gov.au/ref/sa/biogs/SE01101b.htm
Happy to provide more info if you need it. Thanks again for your interest.
June 3, 2014 at 11:56 am
Hi Mike – I clicked through via Sam Searle’s blog and have been catching up on your musings – great stuff. This piece in particular – we’ve had many a conversation along similar lines about research data and it’s many possible forms…
This also piqued my interest from a recent experience in my home suburb of Newtown, where a mural that I loved was painted over with a new one – not the same situation as the one you describe above obviously, but it got me thinking about the ephemeral nature of street art…. almost by definition it’s not intended to last forever, even though some do last a long time through some kind of arbitrary decision about their value over another piece… The Andrew Aitken ‘I have a dream’ mural in Newtown for example is unlikely to ever be painted over even though there is no formal protection applying to it, whereas other more recent pieces by Fintan Magee, Nico and Beastman (my faves – seriously, google Fintan, he’s amazing) could disappear overnight without warning…. And everyone involved is okay with that, because it’s just the way it is…. Even the rumoured Banksy of Enmore wasn’t immune and is now lost to the layers of paint over it. Not sure where I’m going with all this, and it’s a bit off topic from your post, but I find it fascinating!
June 3, 2014 at 5:28 pm
It’s a really interesting area. On one hand I love ephemeral art practice – street art, performance, earth art, live performance with no recording – but am also interested in what should be preserved and how. No easy answers. Maybe the main goal in areas like this is just that things not be destroyed or covered over unthinkingly.
Thanks for checking out my blog!